| Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of Open Pollinated Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties for Mid Altitude Areas of Western Guzi Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia

Published in Plant (Volume 10, Issue 1)
Received: 22 December 2021     Accepted: 11 January 2022     Published: 28 January 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Maize is a major grain crop that is widely adaptable to many agro-ecologies across the world. The goal of the study was to see how adaptable and stable open pollinated maize varieties are in terms of grain yield and yield-related features in the Western Guji Zone's mid-altitude areas. Different genotypes perform differently in each location, which may be used to boost production. Six open pollinated maize varieties were transported from Bako National Maize Research Center and planted in RCBD with three replications at Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center's Galana and Abaya sub sites for three years. The results of the analysis of variance revealed that there was a substantial yield difference between genotypes. Gibe-2 had the greatest average grain production of 5.85 t/ha, followed by Kulani with 5.63 t/ha across years and locations, according to the combined analysis of variance. Kulani was found to be the most stable of all the varieties, whereas Gibe 2 was shown to be the most unstable. Kulani's and ABO-additive Bako's main and multiplicative interaction stability values (ASVs) were both near to zero (0.08 and 0.27, respectively), but Gibe 2's ASV was significantly higher (1.62) and deviated from zero. As a result, Kulani was stable and high yielding across settings, whereas Gibe 2 was high yielding in a single environment (unstable). So, and Kulani were recommended for cultivation in the Galana and Abaya districts of southern Oromia, as well as regions with comparable agro ecologies, while Gibe 2 was recommended for the Galana district.

Published in Plant (Volume 10, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.plant.20221001.13
Page(s) 19-25
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Adaptation, ASV, Genotypes, Stability, Zea mays

References
[1] Gerpacio R, Prabhu P. 2007. Tropical and subtropical maize in Asia: production systems, constraints, and research priorities. CIMMYT.
[2] Riedelsheimer C, Czedik-Eysenberg A, Grieder C, Lisec J, Technow F, Sulpice R, Altmann T, Stitt M, Willmitzer L, Melchinger AE. 2012. Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. Nature genetics. 1; 44 (2): 217-220.
[3] Shiri MR. 2013. Grain yield stability analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under different drought stress conditions using GGE biplot analysis." (2013): 107-112.
[4] Nzuve F, Githiri S, Mukunya DM, Gethi J. 2013. Analysis of genotype x environment interaction for grain yield in maize hybrids. Journal of Agricultural Science, 5 (11), 75.
[5] FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations).2015. FAOSTAT, Retrieved November 26, 2016 from http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E.
[6] FAO (World Food Organization).2016. The State of Food Insecurity in the World: Undernourishment around the World in 2016. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx. Accessed 20, September 2016.
[7] Jaleta, Moti, Menale Kassie, Paswel Marenya, Chilot Yirga, and Olaf Erenstein. "Impact of improved maize adoption on household food security of maize producing smallholder farmers in Ethiopia." Food Security 10, no. 1 (2018): 81-93.
[8] Khalil I, Shah S, Ahmad H. 2010. Stability analysis of maize hybrids across North West of Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot, 42 (2), 1083-1091.
[9] Annicchiarico, P., 1997. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis of genotype-location interaction in variety trials repeated over years. Theoretical and applied genetics, 94 (8), pp. 1072-1077.
[10] Zobel, Richard W., Madison J. Wright, and Hugh G. Gauch Jr. "Statistical analysis of a yield trial." Agronomy journal 80, no. 3 (1988): 388-393.
[11] Gomez K, and Arturo G. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley & Sons.
[12] Pretorius M, Allemann J. Smith M. 2015. Use of the AMMI model to analyse cultivar-environment interaction in cotton under irrigation in South Africa. 2 (2): 76–80.
[13] Purchase JL. 1997. Parametric analysis to describe genotype x environment interaction and yield stability in winter wheat." PhD diss., Ph. D. Thesis, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
[14] Bakala N, Abate B, Nigusie M. “Standard Heterosis of Maize (Zea mays L.) Inbred Lines for Grain Yieldand Yield Related Traits at Southern Ethiopia, Hawassa”. American-Eurasian J. Agric. and Environ. Sci., 17: 2017. 257-264.
[15] Bassa D, Goa Y. 2016. Performance Evaluation and Adaptation of Improved Maize (Zea mays L) Varieties for Highland of Alicho, Silti and Analemo Districts of Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Natural Sciences Research.
[16] Taye T, Bekele N, Shimalis Y. 2016. Evaluation of highland maize at Bule hora District of Southern Oromia, Southern Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 25; 11 (34): 3178-3181. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR
[17] Anley W, Zeleke H, Dessalegn Y. “Genotype X environment interaction of maize (Zea mays L.) across North Western Ethiopia”. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 5: 2013. 171-181.
[18] Epinat-Le Signor C, Dousse S, Lorgeou J, Denis JB, Bonhomme R, Carolo P, Charcosset A. 2001. Interpretation genotype - environment interaction for early maize hybrids over 12 years. Crop Sci. 41: 663–669.
[19] van Eeuwijk FA, Malosetti M, Yin X, Struik PC, Stam P. 2005. Statistical models for genotype by environment data: from conventional ANOVA models to eco-physiological QTL models. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 56 (9): 883-894.
[20] Crossa l. 1990. Statistical analysis of multi-location trials. Adv. in Agron. 44, 55-85.
[21] Akbar, Mohammad Muzahid, and Noorjahan Parvez. "Impact of service quality, trust, and customer satisfaction on customers loyalty." ABAC journal 29, no. 1 (2009).
[22] Rehman, Abdul, M. Farrukh Saleem, Muhammad Ehsan Safdar, Safdar Hussain, and Naeem Akhtar. "Grain quality, nutrient use efficiency, and bioeconomics of maize under different sowing methods and NPK levels." Chilean journal of agricultural research 71, no. 4 (2011): 586.
[23] Kumar P, Singh NK. 2015. Determining behavior of maize genotypes and growing environments using AMMI statistics. SAARC Journal of Agriculture. 15; 13 (1): 162-173.
[24] Miah MA, Ahmed S, Uddin MS. 2016. Assessment of yield stability of maize inbred lines in multi-environment trials. Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 51: 61-68.
[25] Abera W, van Rensburg JB, Labuschagne MT, Maartens H. “Genotype-environment interactions and yield stability analyses of maize in Ethiopia”, South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 21: 2004. 251-254.
[26] Souza FR., Ribeiro PH, Veloso CA, Corrêa LA. 2002. Yielding and phenotypic stability of corn cultivars in three municipal districts of Para State, Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 37: 1269-1274.
[27] Purchase, J. L., 1997. Parametric analysis to describe genotype x environment interaction and yield stability in winter wheat (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State).
[28] Senguttuvel, P., Sravanraju, N., Jaldhani, V., Divya, B., Beulah, P., Nagaraju, P., Manasa, Y., Prasad, A. S., Brajendra, P., Gireesh, C. and Anantha, M. S., 2021. Evaluation of genotype by environment interaction and adaptability in lowland irrigated rice hybrids for grain yield under high temperature. Scientific Reports, 11 (1), pp. 1-13.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Natol Bakala, Belda Idao, Ibsa Jibat. (2022). Evaluation of Open Pollinated Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties for Mid Altitude Areas of Western Guzi Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Plant, 10(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20221001.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Natol Bakala; Belda Idao; Ibsa Jibat. Evaluation of Open Pollinated Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties for Mid Altitude Areas of Western Guzi Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Plant. 2022, 10(1), 19-25. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20221001.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Natol Bakala, Belda Idao, Ibsa Jibat. Evaluation of Open Pollinated Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties for Mid Altitude Areas of Western Guzi Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Plant. 2022;10(1):19-25. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20221001.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.plant.20221001.13,
      author = {Natol Bakala and Belda Idao and Ibsa Jibat},
      title = {Evaluation of Open Pollinated Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties for Mid Altitude Areas of Western Guzi Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia},
      journal = {Plant},
      volume = {10},
      number = {1},
      pages = {19-25},
      doi = {10.11648/j.plant.20221001.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20221001.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.plant.20221001.13},
      abstract = {Maize is a major grain crop that is widely adaptable to many agro-ecologies across the world. The goal of the study was to see how adaptable and stable open pollinated maize varieties are in terms of grain yield and yield-related features in the Western Guji Zone's mid-altitude areas. Different genotypes perform differently in each location, which may be used to boost production. Six open pollinated maize varieties were transported from Bako National Maize Research Center and planted in RCBD with three replications at Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center's Galana and Abaya sub sites for three years. The results of the analysis of variance revealed that there was a substantial yield difference between genotypes. Gibe-2 had the greatest average grain production of 5.85 t/ha, followed by Kulani with 5.63 t/ha across years and locations, according to the combined analysis of variance. Kulani was found to be the most stable of all the varieties, whereas Gibe 2 was shown to be the most unstable. Kulani's and ABO-additive Bako's main and multiplicative interaction stability values (ASVs) were both near to zero (0.08 and 0.27, respectively), but Gibe 2's ASV was significantly higher (1.62) and deviated from zero. As a result, Kulani was stable and high yielding across settings, whereas Gibe 2 was high yielding in a single environment (unstable). So, and Kulani were recommended for cultivation in the Galana and Abaya districts of southern Oromia, as well as regions with comparable agro ecologies, while Gibe 2 was recommended for the Galana district.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Evaluation of Open Pollinated Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties for Mid Altitude Areas of Western Guzi Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia
    AU  - Natol Bakala
    AU  - Belda Idao
    AU  - Ibsa Jibat
    Y1  - 2022/01/28
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20221001.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.plant.20221001.13
    T2  - Plant
    JF  - Plant
    JO  - Plant
    SP  - 19
    EP  - 25
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0677
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20221001.13
    AB  - Maize is a major grain crop that is widely adaptable to many agro-ecologies across the world. The goal of the study was to see how adaptable and stable open pollinated maize varieties are in terms of grain yield and yield-related features in the Western Guji Zone's mid-altitude areas. Different genotypes perform differently in each location, which may be used to boost production. Six open pollinated maize varieties were transported from Bako National Maize Research Center and planted in RCBD with three replications at Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center's Galana and Abaya sub sites for three years. The results of the analysis of variance revealed that there was a substantial yield difference between genotypes. Gibe-2 had the greatest average grain production of 5.85 t/ha, followed by Kulani with 5.63 t/ha across years and locations, according to the combined analysis of variance. Kulani was found to be the most stable of all the varieties, whereas Gibe 2 was shown to be the most unstable. Kulani's and ABO-additive Bako's main and multiplicative interaction stability values (ASVs) were both near to zero (0.08 and 0.27, respectively), but Gibe 2's ASV was significantly higher (1.62) and deviated from zero. As a result, Kulani was stable and high yielding across settings, whereas Gibe 2 was high yielding in a single environment (unstable). So, and Kulani were recommended for cultivation in the Galana and Abaya districts of southern Oromia, as well as regions with comparable agro ecologies, while Gibe 2 was recommended for the Galana district.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bako Agricultural Research Center, Bako, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agricultural Research Center, Yabello, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agricultural Research Center, Yabello, Ethiopia

  • Sections